Reduction of Warranty Fraud through Inspection and Combination Warranty Policies for Automotive Batteries

Authors

  • Asri Alfiah Fajri Bandung Institute of Technology
  • Bermawi Priyatna Iskandar Bandung Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61221/jriem.v2i2.39

Keywords:

car battery, Free Replacement Warranty (FRW), Nash game theory, Pro-Rata Warranty (PRW), warranty fraud

Abstract

Warranty plays a crucial role in marketing new products as they signal the quality of the product to consumers. However, implementing warranty also requires warranty providers to incur additional costs known as warranty costs. The annual warranty costs for global automotive manufacturers have increased from 2018 to 2022, with fraudulent warranty claims estimated to account for 3-15% of the total warranty costs. This study aims to develop an effective decision model to minimize warranty fraud on batteries for cars produced by PT. X. Car battery warranty claim data from 2019, recorded and inspected by PT. X, was used to develop a failure model, warranty policy models, and decision-making model using Nash game theory. The findings indicate that the Pro-Rata Warranty (PRW) policy is more effective in reducing warranty fraud. The results also suggest that customer behavior in committing fraud is influenced by several factors, including product reliability, penalty costs, inspection costs, battery manufacturing costs, battery purchase costs, and the period of Free Replacement Warranty (FRW) policy. Optimal inspection strategies and appropriate warranty policies can significantly reduce warranty fraud, thereby reducing the warranty cost burden borne by the warranty provider.

References

Arnum, E. (2015). Private interview on April 14.

Blischke, W.R., & Murthy, D.N.P. (2019). Warranty Cost Analysis. CRC Press.

European Union. Guarantees And Returns. Your Europe, https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees-returns/index_en.htm.

Federal Trade Commission. Guides Against Deceptive Pricing. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-239.

He, Z., Zhang, Y., He, S., Wang, D., & Huang, H. (2020). Warranty Service Outsourcing Contracts Decision Considering Warranty Fraud and Inspection. International Transactions in Operational Research, 00, 1–26.

Kurvinen, M., Töyrylä, I., & Murthy, D.N.P. (2016). Warranty Fraud Management: Reducing Fraud and Other Excess Costs in Warranty and Service Operations. Kanada: John Wiley dan Sons, Inc.

Murthy, D.N.P., & Blischke, W. R. (2006). Warranty Management and Product Manufacture. Springer Science dan Business Media.

Murthy, D.N.P., & Jack, N. (2017). Game theoretic modelling of service agent warranty fraud. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68, 1399–1408.

O’Connor, A.N., Modarres, M., & Mosleh, A. (2016). Probability Distributions Used in Reliability Engineering. The Center for Risk and Reliability: University of Maryland.

Pandit, A. & Gupta, S. (2021). Identification And Prevention Of Fraud For Remanufactured Products In Reverse Supply Chain. Dissertation, Northeastern University.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1999 Number 42).

Worldwide Auto Warranty Expenses 2018 – 2022 a report from Warranty Week, https://www.warrantyweek.com/archive/ww20230817.html.

Wu, S. J., & S. R. Huang. (2010). Optimal warranty length for a rayleigh distributed product with progressive censoring. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 59 (4), 661–66.

Downloads

Published

30-11-2024

How to Cite

Alfiah Fajri, A., & Iskandar, B. P. (2024). Reduction of Warranty Fraud through Inspection and Combination Warranty Policies for Automotive Batteries. Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering and Management, 2(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.61221/jriem.v2i2.39

Issue

Section

Research Articles