Work-Related Musculoskeletal Symptoms Among Rattan Craft Workers: A Cross-Sectional Ergonomic Assessment

Authors

  • Mukhammad Al - Yusni Department of Industrial Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Khoirul Muslim Department of Industrial Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61221/jriem.v4i1.78

Keywords:

work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomic risk assessment, rattan craft, traditional handcraft, occupational health, SNI 9011:2021

Abstract

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) represent a significant occupational health burden in labor-intensive industries, particularly in traditional craft sectors. Despite the economic importance of Indonesia’s rattan craft industry, no systematic investigation of ergonomic risks and musculoskeletal health outcomes among rattan workers has been conducted. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of WMSDs symptoms, identify task-specific ergonomic risk factors, and propose targeted interventions to improve working conditions in the rattan craft industry. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 workers across eight rattan craft workshops in Cirebon Regency, Indonesia. Ergonomic risk assessment was performed using Indonesia’s SNI 9011:2021 standard, incorporating postural analysis, workstation measurements, task timing, and environmental monitoring. WMSDs symptoms were assessed using a modified questionnaire adapted from SNI 9011:2021. Chi-square tests examined associations between individual and work-related factors and symptom severity. High prevalence rates of WMSDs symptoms were documented including 66% for lower back, 63% for hands, and 51% for shoulders. Task-specific risk scores ranged from 13 to 19.5, with steaming tasks receiving the highest score (19.5) due to prolonged standing (75.49% of workday), extreme forward bending (37.6° neck flexion, 32.8° torso flexion), and heat exposure (34.45°C). Binding tasks caused severe shoulder complaints in 81.5% of workers due to sustained overhead arm activity. Significant associations were found between symptoms and smoking status (hands: p=0.049; lower back: p=0.037), gender (shoulders: p<0.001), and workstation design. Rattan craft workers experience high rates of musculoskeletal symptoms comparable to the highest reported in traditional craft literature. Task-specific ergonomic hazards, particularly prolonged standing and extreme postural demands in steaming and binding tasks, require urgent intervention. Recommendations include workstation redesign to accommodate anthropometric diversity, introduction of mechanical assists for high-force tasks, environmental controls for heat and lighting, and integration of smoking cessation programs with ergonomic improvements.

References

1. Akhtar, S. M. F., Mumtaz, N., & Khan, A. R. (2025). Prevalence and nature of ergonomic hazards among construction workers in India: A cross-sectional study. Safety, 11(3), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11030062

2. Antropometri Indonesia. (2024). Antropometri Indonesia The Largest Antrhopometry Data in Indonesia . https://www.antropometriindonesia.org/index.php

3. Arifah, D. A., Rahma, R. A. A., & Harmini, T. (2024). Ergonomic hazards related to musculoskeletal disorders among workers of traditional manufacturing industries in Ponorogo Regency. International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijphs.v99i1.23942

4. Bernard, B. P. (1997). Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: A critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back (NIOSH Publication No. 97–141). National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/21745

5. Das, B. (2018). An evaluation of low back pain among female garment workers in Bangladesh. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 24(4), 649–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1316612

6. David, G. C. (2005). Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occupational Medicine, 55(3), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqi082

7. Eastman Kodak Company. (2004). Kodak’s ergonomic design for people at work (2nd ed.). Wiley.

8. EU-OSHA. (2019). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: prevalence, costs and demographics in the EU. Dalam European Statistics on Accidents at Work. European Health. https://doi.org/10.2802/66947

9. Fikre, Z., Gebrehiwot, M., & Alemu, K. (2024). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders and associated factors among industrial workers: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1443217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1443217

10. Freivalds, A., & Niebel. (2012). Niebel’s Methods, Standards, and Work Design, 12th Edition (12 ed.). McGraw Hill. http://create.mcgraw-hill.com

11. Guimarães, L. B. M. de, Anzanello, M. J., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Saurin, T. A. (2015). Participatory ergonomics intervention for improving human and production outcomes of a Brazilian furniture company. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 49, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.02.002

12. Hagberg, M., Silverstein, B., Wells, R., Smith, M. J., Hendrick, H. W., Carayon, P., & Pérusse, M. (1995). Work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs): A reference book for prevention. Taylor & Francis.

13. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2022). ILO supports inclusion of musculoskeletal disorders into list of occupational diseases. https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/ilo-supports-inclusion-musculoskeletal-disorders-list-occupational-diseases.

14. ILO, I. L. O., & IEA, I. E. A. (2010). Ergonomic checkpoints : Practical and easy-to-implement solutions for improving safety, health and working conditions. (Second). International Labour Organization.

15. Kemenkes. (2002). Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1405/MENKES/SK/XI/2002 Tentang Persyaratan Kesehatan Lingkungan Kerja Perkantoran dan Industri.

16. Krishnan, K. S., Raju, G., & Shawkataly, O. (2021). Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Psychological and physical risk factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9361. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179361

17. Prasetya, T. A. E., Samad, N. I. A., Rahmania, A., Arifah, D. A., Rahma, R. A. A., & Al Mamun, A. (2024). Workstation risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders among IT professionals in Indonesia. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 57(5), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.24.214

18. Putsa, B., Jalayondeja, W., Mekhora, K., Bhuanantanondh, P., & Jalayondeja, C. (2022). Factors associated with reduced risk of musculoskeletal disorders among office workers: a cross-sectional study 2017 to 2020. BMC Public Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13940-0

19. SNI 9011-2021. (2021). SNI 9011-2021_Ergonomi.

20. Tran, T. T. (2022). Prevalence and risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers in manufacturing industries [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University]. Thammasat University Digital Archive. https://ethesisarchive.library.tu.ac.th/thesis/2022/TU_2022_6117040029_16676_22926.pdf

Downloads

Published

31-05-2026

How to Cite

Al - Yusni, M., & Muslim, K. (2026). Work-Related Musculoskeletal Symptoms Among Rattan Craft Workers: A Cross-Sectional Ergonomic Assessment. Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61221/jriem.v4i1.78

Issue

Section

Research Articles